Logo Platform
Company of Heroes 3
Universe banner wording

Company of Heroes 3 - US Forces Overview

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
3 years ago
Aug 31, 2021, 11:17:14 PM

Company of Heroes 3 - US Forces Overview


Overview

Company of Heroes 3’s US Forces faction is designed to represent an early war US Armed Forces that fought in the Mediterranean theater from 1943 through to 1944. Like previous installments of the faction in Company of Heroes, the US Forces caters to an aggressive playstyle that benefits from superior production, mobility and combined arms. Featuring a familiar unit roster while introducing new faction mechanics and an updated tech structure, the US Forces faction allows the player to be flexible with their strategy and adapt their tactics as necessary at each stage of a match.



Army Attributes

Strengths

  • Flexibility – The US Forces’ tech structure and unit composition allows for a variety of build orders and strategies that the player can adapt at each stage of a match
  • Production – A significant aspect of the Army’s strength lies in their numbers and their ability to out-maneuver, flank and overwhelm their opponent
  • Combined Arms – The US Forces faction is at its optimal performance when utilizing a combination of infantry, vehicles and air support in coordinated assaults
  • Reconnaissance – The US Forces will excel at reconnaissance and information gathering through their various units and capabilities. 
  • Air Superiority – The US Forces will possess the ability to build and utilize planes in a unique manner through the Air Support Center.

Weaknesses

  • Support Weapons – American heavy machine guns and mortars lack the stopping power, fire rate, range and other attributes of their superior German counterparts
  • Armored Vehicles – The American armored vehicles have strength in numbers, but their thinner armor and lower penetration make them vulnerable in frontal assaults

Power Curve
The US Forces’ low production costs and strong core infantry allows the faction to be very aggressive in the early stages of a match. This presents the faction the opportunity to push the initiative early, allowing them to capture large amounts of territory and go for key resource points and enemy cutoffs. As the match progresses, the US Forces’ advantage will begin to level out with the Wehrmacht’s broad set of tools. Finally, at the later stages of a match the US Forces player will need to rely on strength in numbers and combined arms to match the Wehrmacht’s elite infantry, superior armor and weaponry.


Tech Tree & Unit Roster
The US Forces will feature 15 core units. Below is the current roster and their respective production buildings.


US Forces HQ
The starting building for the US Forces, in addition to housing the faction’s tech upgrades and support centers, the HQ also deploys Scout and Engineer squads to the battlefield.

Units
  • Scouts – A mobile reconnaissance squad with strong utility and fast territory capturing capability
  • Engineers – The toolbox of the US Forces, capable of constructing defenses, repairing vehicles and emplacements, and assaulting fortifications when upgraded with flamethrowers
  • Captain – This “lead-by-example” squad is effective against enemy infantry and comes equipped with a variety of upgrades and abilities to support their forces in the field


Upgrades

  • Infantry Support Center – This upgrade is 1 of the 2 required for the faction to “tech up,” improves munitions income and unlocks various infantry-focused global upgrades
  • Air Support Center - This upgrade is 1 of the 2 required for the faction to “tech up” and unlocks access to Air Support abilities such as high-altitude recon runs, strafing runs, and bombing runs
  • Mechanized Support Center - This upgrade is 1 of the 2 required for the faction to “tech up” and unlocks various global upgrades that improve light and medium vehicles


Barracks

The cornerstone of the US Forces, capable of deploying Riflemen, Jeeps and Mortar Teams.


Units

  • Riflemen – The backbone of the US Forces utilizing strong firepower and scalability through veterancy and upgrades such as BAR light machine guns, Sticky Bombs and Mk. II Grenades
  • Mortar Team – A versatile indirect fire support team that can displace enemy team weapons and counter garrisoned units and static emplacements
  • Willys Jeep – Called the workhorse for the US Forces, the Willys Jeep is an effective sniper-hunter and comes well-equipped for reconnaissance and fire support


Upgrades

  • Grenades Package – Riflemen are equipped with short-range anti-vehicle explosive weapons and Mk. II ‘Pineapple’ Grenades for additional explosive power
  • Browning Automatic Rifles (BAR) – Riflemen are equipped with powerful, high rate-of-fire rifles that are effective at all ranges


Weapon Support Center

The WSC provides the US Forces with additional fire support allowing for diverse builds and supports defensive playstyles in both 1v1 and team games.

  • Heavy Machine Gun Team – A powerful anti-infantry support weapon capable of suppressing multiple squads and defending key positions
  • Bazooka Team – A specialized anti-vehicle squad that can ambush the enemy and defend against armored assaults.
  • Sniper – An elite unit that is highly effective at bleeding the enemy’s manpower and countering static support weapons
  • M3 Halftrack (w/ Medical, Quad .50cal & 75mm Upgrades) - This mobile reinforcement platform can bolster the frontlines and transition to a powerful anti-air/anti-infantry weapon, 75mm mobile anti-tank gun, or medical support vehicle.


Motor Pool

This mechanized production building allows the US Forces faction to push the advantage and continue their aggression with a light armored assault and anti-tank weapons.

  • Greyhound – Equipped with a 37mm turret and upgradable with a .50cal machine gun, the Greyhound is a fast and deadly armored vehicle capable of destroying enemy infantry and light vehicle targets
  • 57mm Anti-Tank Gun – A formidable defensive tool, the 57mm AT gun is the US Forces’ hard-counter to German armored vehicles
  • Chaffee Light Tank – Small but fierce, the Chaffee Light Tank is fast, mobile, and packs a punch with its 75mm main gun, but can go down quickly if not handled with care.


Tank Depot

The final tier of the US Forces unlocks a host of armored tanks and destructive power capable of dealing the final blow to the enemy.

  • M18 Hellcat – The fast and agile 76mm Hellcat is the primary tank destroyer in the US Forces faction; what it lacks in armor it makes up for in speed, penetration and range
  • M4A1 Sherman – One of the most iconic tanks in WW2, the Sherman has thick armor, a powerful 75mm main gun and can be upgraded with a .50cal machine gun 
  • 105mm Bulldozer Sherman – Heavy frontal armor combined with a bulldozer blade allows this tank to plow through entrenched positions and devastate the enemy with short-range, high explosive 105mm shells

Faction Mechanics
The US Forces offers three different upgrades that advance their tech and offer unique strategic benefits. These upgrades are focused around three main themes: Air Superiority, Mechanized Support, and Infantry Support. Outside of tech unlocks, the US Forces also offers casualty clearing via the Medical Station to receive discounted reinforcements.


Mechanized Support Center
Overview

The MSC allows players to heavily invest in a mechanized strategy, focusing on a combination of light and medium vehicles. In addition to unlocking various upgrades for the M3 Halftrack, the MSC also provides passive repairs to nearby vehicles and grants access to a variety of global upgrades that improve light and medium vehicles in the core army.

Key Points

  • Unlocks the following upgrades on the M3 Halftrack
    • M45 Quadmount
    • 75mm Motor Gun Carriage 
    • Medical Halftrack
  • Unlocks global upgrades that improve the army’s mechanized capabilities
  • Unlocks a Mechanized Repair Bay in the base that passively repairs nearby vehicles

Air Support Center
Overview
The ASC focuses on combined arms tactics via air support planes used in coordination with infantry and vehicles. Once purchased, the ASC grants access to reconnaissance, strafing and bombing plane abilities.

Key Points
  • Unlocks the following air support abilities:
    • High Altitude Reconnaissance
    • Anti-Infantry Strafing Run
    • High Explosive Bombing Run
  • Unlocks global upgrades that improve the army’s air support capabilities


Infantry Support Center
Overview

The ISC is intended to allow a player to heavily invest in infantry and infantry-focused strategies. Once purchased, the ISC increases the player’s default munitions income and provides access to a variety of global upgrades focused on infantry economy, logistics, and support.


Key Points

  • Increases default munitions income
  • Unlocks global upgrades that improve the army’s infantry economy and support capabilities


Medical Station - Casualty Clearing

Overview

The Medical Station is the army’s primary in-base healing platform with a twist. In addition to passively healing nearby infantry and team weapons, the Medical Station also spawns Field Medics that roam the battlefield searching for and returning downed infantry from the brink of death. Returned casualties grant up to 6 free reinforcements in the base sector.


Key Points

  • Unlocks Field Medics
    • Passive infantry units that automatically spawn from the Medical Station
    • Passively rescue casualties on the battlefield that provide free reinforcements once returned to base





Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Aug 31, 2021, 11:38:18 PM

Are there only going to be the airborne and special forces for the battle groups? Or was that just the intro to the US forces we are going to see?

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 12:09:50 AM
Banditks wrote:

Are there only going to be the airborne and special forces for the battle groups? Or was that just the intro to the US forces we are going to see?

This overview is just for the core faction. We'll have more details on specific battlegroups down the road. :) 

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 12:13:21 AM

While the overview is nice to see and US feel solid so far,

this balance approach sounds a lot like COH2 style side balance again where one side has all the 'overpowered' and low micro, easy to use and all-rounder units with the easy teching and wipe tools - and the other side has to play combined arms with weaker and highly micro intensive units with little room for error, which just is not good no matter how thematically fitting.


If you really want to go this route again then please make sure this is at least evened out between the factions, so that there is one faction on each side that is high skillcap combined arms and really not hoard it again all on one side, that was really poor in COH2 to this day. Maybe this works a bit better in 1v1 than in 2v2+ games but still this never makes sense.


You don't need to give one faction all the weak things and the other all the strong ones. Its not forbidden to give X the better MG and Y the better AT et cetera.

But this sounds again like one side stands with the much more powerful PAK and panthers against highly micro intensive shermans and 57mms which need to use an ability on the right timing and have 2x the micro to even compete against the other doing an attack move. 


This type of balancing sure works for the top 5% and 1v1 higher level players but not for anyone else. I am strongly above average but people I play with and for my friends and teammates that is neither fair nor fun. Each faction should have a at least somewhat similar share of combined arms, micro, (tech)choices, power spikes, powerful and weak units, just split differently, otherwise we get this huge difficulty and cause-effect imbalance again.


From this loadout the Bulldozer stands out, if that were to be the US lategame special trump card, allowing them to assert dominance on infantry while getting dominated in the tank department, that would make this more interesting. But if Wehrmacht gets a non doctrinal Brummbär as well which then likely again deals a ton more effective damage than the Bulldozer while Shermans stand as Panther lunch, then this sounds not good at all, and I play more Wehr than US.

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 12:13:42 AM


Looks good. The concepts looks a lot of fun. Only concern is indirect fire for dealing with dug in team weapons, which appears to be entirely built around their 105mm Bulldozer without diverting, which historically can't handle AT traps.
Hopefully, the separate focuses can be teched independently, so they lead to a high power combined arms late game for the fabulous Marathon games.
Lastly, as Relic appears to be designing another Team Weapons vs Infantry dichotomy, please keep in mind map design to mitigate retreat distance (and time) and provide real flanking potential. Also, don't put make-it-or-break-it resources (Fuel in CoH2) on the front line. Nothing results in early game quits than one team controlling the mandatory resources.
Try closer to Hill 400 with safe fuel, and less Redball Express.

As mentioned above me, try to make the micro tax for each side equal best you can. RTS games live and die on micro-intensiveness.


Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 2:25:28 AM

It just looks and feels so much like CoH1 redux that I can't get super excited about it.


* I don't think its a good plan to design factions that have stronger late games than others.  You can have power levels wax and wane along the way, but the late game needs to be about equal.  Team games are too much a part of the playerbase to design a game where one side is disadvantaged for 40 of the 60 minutes.  Even in 1v1, knowing you are on a clock to win has never been a particularly fun game mechanic for multiplayer.


* Artillery was a decisive edge for the Allies in WW2, and there is barely any mention of it here. Americans artillery doctrine was light years ahead of the Germans, and they absolutely mauled German positions with forward observers calling in coordinated barrages that linked multiple batteries in different locations into massively powerful Time on Target barrages.  Artillery likewise makes sense in a Fire and Maneuver style army, allowing them to pin enemies down while they maneuver and/or harass prepared positions to force them into the open.


* I'd rather stick to the weapon rack system (and expand it) rather than go back to specialists. While it ended up fairly formulaic, it had the right idea to allow for versatility in unit comps.  We also got to use things you would otherwise never see like AT Engineers (instead of everyone just using Flamethrowers) and squads with mixed capabilities in teamgames. (Or LT in 1v1) Going up to 3-4 different weapons would create a lot of variety in how you build your squads each game.


* I'm not sure why we are going back to having to construct base buildings with Engineers.  The USF/OKW systems in CoH2 streamlined the process dramatically, and its not like base layout and building was a major part of CoH1/2 like it is for say Starcraft or AoE.

* I'd really like it if the USF support weapons had better setup/teardown times and were more mobile in general to compliment the USF playstyle.  They could better move up (or fall back) to support attacks, but retain the reduced range/power/arcs that are found in the Axis armies.

* A lot of the vehicle choices strike me as peculiar for the stock army.  Chaffee came super late in the war, and the Stuart just makes more sense in that slot. (granted, diversifying it from the Greyhound may prove a challenge)  The M10 was a far larger part of the Tank Destroyer force than the M18, especially if we are starting in 1943.  The Priest seems like it would round out the late game vehicle roster better than a Bulldozer Sherman, which is going to play too much like a stock Sherman imo. (especially if the stock Sherman retains its strong HE round)
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 3:02:39 AM

I agree with another user up above stating that I see a lot of nostalgic features coming back. But It doesn't seem like innovation but a way to pull some old school coh1 players back. (But I'm always a die-hard fan for the old one).


  1. Artillery support play-style is America's doctrine in WW2
  2. US Special forces was quite extensive: Devils Brigade, 100th/442nd RCT, Darbys Rangers
  3.  Late game, really specific task tanks. American armor was rather weak in regards of polar opposites to German armor doctrine. *Mobility/speed* vs *armor/balanced*
USF weapon teams, were not as powerful as the MG42 but was highly mobile. So perhaps 30cal short range/fast redeploy vs MG42 long range/long redeploy

Base building is a thing of a past. Coh2 has stepped it up, so perhaps a new form of map layout or commander centered way to determine base building or not? That would be big and new. Commander varied Base types? UKF arty base vs US Armor HQ.  Lets take the old nostalgic look but reintroduce how we see base layout/construction/choices.

Perhaps resource production would be innovative and fresh for Coh3 where other RTS have already used. **Supply Lines?**
Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 4:43:48 AM

Thank you for sharing the US Forces Overview JT!


This really did remind me of COH original when reading it, for me that's a good thing but everyone's response afterwards was really spot on I believe. It's a balance to keep what was great but also advance the game, there is a fine line that will never please everyone but hopefully good enough to find a middle ground. I personally rarely play as US in Coh2 because my micro is awful, I always like the engineers tank traps unlocked right away, lol my turtle ways but as a faction my APM is slow and I'd always play better as Wehr due to what others mentioned were advantages to their tech tree and unit roster. I'm american, I'd like to play as americans too so I'm glad they are described as flexible but like @ShrikeGFX states, depending upon battlegroups selected, there should be some disparity for all factions opposed to strict theme locking absolute playstyles if that makes sense. I think it's good they have their general strengths/weaknesses but I also agree with him no matter your playstyle you can still select either Axis/Allies. That would be good for the game and I agree with him there.


The most interesting center to me was the Air Support Center, maybe because it's new and I'm curious to see how strong/impactful it can be in the game but I'm also wondering if it's just same as Coh 2 really high cost and with limited use but fairly powerful or if they have more variety of options this go around. Like in Ardennes Assault you could upgrade your tree to add another plane for strafing for a price, so hopefully these faction centers have those sort of upgrades outside the BattleGroup tech tree.


The most interesting unit I saw was the Jeep has returned from coh 1 but it specifically states Willy's Jeep so I'm hopeful it's more than just a sniper hunter with a good sight radius. I have a friend who will often get a 4 or 5 star kubelwagen and it always impresses me especially against AI who can converge on units it wants destroyed really quickly. If the Jeep could last long in matches if micro-ed well, that would be cool but it'd have to have purpose beyond sniper hunting, it did state support so I'm hopeful.


The other difference I noticed in pre-alpha and this breakdown was the dedicated bazooka team. I see this can help allies counter germans but I'm curious how effective they are or how spongey they are against other infantry, I'm hoping they are not completely useless. I also sort of agree with @IntoTheRain where he said he'd rather stick with weapon rack system, or expand it, I liked that idea too. I also liked how it appears they are making the mechanized support center the "x" factor of whether you go medical/quad/motor gun carriage. I like that flexibility within one center. The fuel cost will be critical for that to work well. I wouldn't like to be limited to just one or two of those due to high fuel/cap cost. But I really like the feedback of having faster redeploy of MG to counter the lack of range and firepower of MG42, great idea. And maybe they even have secondary weapons while mobile or relocating? Shotguns on mg team for CQB and can keep them like that or lock em down with mg so sort of either/or type of unit or that could make them too OP, but just an idea others have mentioned more hand-to-hand or shotguns/bayonet style features.


The last point the medical station, I'm a bit confused by the casualty clearing, why would you cap it as 6 free reinforcements in the base sector? That seems like it would help early game but then after that it's just heal station. The 6 free just doesn't seem like a great value. I get they have to balance it so Allies aren't just stocked on manpower but 6 is like going to impact the game? Maybe in the elite 1v1 matches but I don't know, that specific number just stood out to me, like hmm okay. I suppose that's something, a nice perk but I'm sure they've ran all sorts of algorithms that determined 6 was the best number to not ruin the meta process.


- Art of War

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 6:34:17 AM

Oh god snipers. One of THE worst designs in all of CoH history and they're back for the third time. Could we just finally accept they're rubbish and just stop including them in the game ? They effectively break the core precepts of the game... for no real purpose except to satisfy someone who clearly has no interest in actually playing the game and balancing them is always going to be a problem because they're a gimmick unit.


Never mind they create such tedious gameplay even as they're effectively breaking the core concepts of the game. So while the rest looks great. Could we just take the sniper aside and say goodbye forever ?

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 6:54:00 AM
Spiralshiroe wrote:

I agree with another user up above stating that I see a lot of nostalgic features coming back. But It doesn't seem like innovation but a way to pull some old school coh1 players back.

completely fine by me. they're entirely correct that doing this will bring diehards back in, and while this entire forum complains that their casual games aren't balanced, it would be nice to see the competitive edge back.


a lot of these faction changes make sense to me and will bring the flexibility in playstyle while encouraging aggression. the CCS reinforcement pool is an interesting idea -- relic fucked up coh 1 US upkeep, so if they use a similar approach here that would help alleviate the primary issue with the faction.


it's about time this community learns to play properly. I strongly encourage the devs to continue with this core philosophy of challenge and asymmetry. if you dumb this game down to what coh 2 was, you're never going to capture the actual competitive scene and especially not the coh 1 players.

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 7:28:44 AM

No M3 Lee or Grant. Ughhhhh. I understand the m4 from a historical perspective, but from a gameplay perspective I'm not sure how you do 3 games in a row building up to the exact same unit.

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 8:40:06 AM

Feedback:

1. if the Mechanized support center has repairing without micro, in my opinion there should be a risk-reward mechanic for build/not build it or the possibility to destroy it. In coh2 the OKW t3 was often placed in the field to get the vehicles repaired and back to the frontline faster, which also included the risk to get it destroyed more easily. If it's tied to the base sector you cannot destroy it. However I understand the idea of the thematically US-Production advantages etc.


possible solution: Maybe you could get the repairer models killed by rushing the base. if killed, you have to rebuild them with MP. This would encourage aggressive play and base attacks.


2. Similar case with the field medics. I guess the micro tax is that you have to click on the medics on the field if you see one to kill them. i preferred the old system in coh1 with the on-field centres, which had to be placed strategically and could be destroyed.


At least make the field medics a purchasable upgrade to the medical station so you have to make a decision if you want them


3. can recon/strafe/bombing runs be countered with Anti Air?


4. What Dane said about the snipers



Thank you for your awesome games relic

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 9:35:32 AM

Love the update but it seems like such a small roster no? Would be nice to have more units, even if slightly similar but with diff costs....Where is the Stuart,, m20, Jackson,LT, Sherman crocodile, rangers, cavalry riflemen, assault engineers, rear echelons (I cry)?! I hope that there are more units available that are non doctrinal across the board for factions otherwise it can get stale making and using the same units especially for hardcore players (who make up the majority of players rn) like myself who love the online, please try to squeeze in more non doctrinal units. 

0
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 11:14:01 AM
ImperialDane wrote:

Oh god snipers. One of THE worst designs in all of CoH history and they're back for the third time. ... They effectively break the core precepts of the game...

So your opinion is based on what? CoH1 or CoH2? Because in CoH1 nature of camo made them broken and spammable. In CoH2 only 1 out 5 factions have always awaible countersnipe strate of the bat and 2 factions have no counter sniping options what so ever. 


If Relic make them costly, add limit to them and all factions would have access to cheap counters which will nuke them to hell if played badly, they will be completly fine.

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 11:20:03 AM
PlugDoctor wrote:
ImperialDane wrote:

Oh god snipers. One of THE worst designs in all of CoH history and they're back for the third time. ... They effectively break the core precepts of the game...

So your opinion is based on what? CoH1 or CoH2? Because in CoH1 nature of camo made them broken and spammable. In CoH2 only 1 out 5 factions have always awaible countersnipe strate of the bat and 2 factions have no counter sniping options what so ever. 


If Relic make them costly, add limit to them and all factions would have access to cheap counters which will nuke them to hell if played badly, they will be completly fine.


Both Games. The design is inherently bad. Hence why i say they are one of the worst designs in the history of CoH and break core precepts of the game. It's not just the camoflage. It's that you have a unit which entire purpose is to snipe infantry and make a complete mockery of cover, maneuver or anything else. And the fact that you have to highlight that to counter them you need another sniper because the absolutely backwards design of the sniper means you can't have it be otherwise easily counter-able should be another warning light that the design of the sniper is so utterly bad and mind-bogglingly bizarre that i simply cannot fathom why they'd decide to add it to the third game. 2 games spanning i dunno.. 16 years ? Should be sufficient evidence that the Sniper is an inherently bad idea that should never be added to another CoH game.. Period.


It's a bad gimmick that should never have been there in the first place, it's a terrible answer to a bad question no one asked.

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 11:30:37 AM
IntoTheRain wrote:
* I'm not sure why we are going back to having to construct base buildings with Engineers.  The USF/OKW systems in CoH2 streamlined the process dramatically, and its not like base layout and building was a major part of CoH1/2 like it is for say Starcraft or AoE.

In the pre-alpha, buildings were built by automatron engineers in the base, not the units you use on the field. It's basically the same system USF and UKF had in coh2, but with you still choosing where the buildings go.

0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 12:03:35 PM

Nice that USA has a countersniper now. Will help usa alot in case wehrmacht is going for a sniper!


0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 12:24:42 PM

For the love of god, stop with the one faction being stronger endgame and you as the opponent have to play a perfect game to compete versus a faction that is more forgiving and has more options.

Make the different factions be in large have the same setup (all have access to mg,sniper,bike etc from the same type of building, so you are not limiting your starting army with the type of first building you pick to start with) but with a small difference so that you can pick the faction that fits you the best.

Factions should have the same overall strength at early game, mid game and endgame. Making it up to the players decisions being the winning actions.

Updated 3 years ago.
0
3 years ago
Sep 1, 2021, 3:05:37 PM
So glad to see medics rescuing casualties once again it being turned into reinforcements and not squads. Will this be available to all sides? 
Also will vehicle crews be able to abandon vehicles like in Comapny of Heroes 2? If so will it be avaliable to all factions? 

Many thanks 

0
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment
0