In 4v4 battle.
The British have a hard time fighting enemy MG42 and mortars with le.IG 18.
The UK has no conventional mobile mortars or artillery,
From the first half to the second half, you will struggle with the enemy MG42 and the mortar.
This time, despite British adjustments, there is no fundamental mortar, so things remain the same.
The Universal Carrier can only be active when the enemy has no anti-tank gun in the first half.
In the midfield, your MG is easily attacked by enemy mortars and becomes unilateral. It is difficult to beat the opponent MG42.
Since there is no mortar, it cannot be counterattacked and will be unilaterally fired by enemy mortars and le.IG 18.
Even if you use AEC to eliminate MG42, it will be severe if the enemy has an anti-tank gun.
The British have a mortar base. It is easily destroyed by a counterattack.
I don't see anyone using mortar positions.
Even in the second half, there is no artillery, so fighting MG42 is tough. either attacking with a tank or bombing a commander. So the commander's choice is Royal Artillery or Lend Lease. Choices become narrower.
Germany is free to choose a commander. Elephant? Tiger? leFH 18?
Everyone should try 4v4 using the British Army. Defeating MG42 and mortar is hard.
Why doesn't Britain have artillery? .
Germany has artillery. Normal mortars and le.IG 18. SdKfz 251 and Panzerwerfer 42.
Normal artillery should be deployed to both sides for fairness.
I'm not good at English. I use google translation.