Majority of commanders seem useless
#1
4 years ago
MCMartel
Posts: 1,855
Dear Community,
Is it just me or are the majority of commanders far worse than a handful of decent one's, with abilities that there is no point in ever using. I want to know if I'm missing something or the commanders are just really badly balanced.
Comments
It depends on the faction. US Airborne is a solid commander any way you spin it, but I would rank Heavy Cavalry and Recon Company right up there with it. With you Recon you finally have a reliable medium tank, and Heavy Cavalry capitalizes on the US's infantry tactics while finally letting them slug it out with heavy armor. Meanwhile you have Mechanized which I agree doesn't seem to add much to the table.
I agree.
Alot of the commanders seems useless.
Or atleast a to big diffurance from some of the others. Often seems to be the same ones getting used again and again.
Would be great if some of the more useless would get a helping hand, and in that way bringing more variation.
Aye, soviet defence commander is a piece of tank trap that he have.
But i think Relic will redesign some useless commanders someday
I think most of the older us commanders are obselete after the realse of the new ones.
Airborne is a Manpower drain any way you spin it; P47 strafe is inaccurate, expensive, and shitty, and abilities from other commanders hold up much better through the game. And Recon company doesn't have a medium tank?
some of the old commanders were obsolete BEFORE the release of the commander themselves (nkvd for example)