Yappir

About

Username
Yappir
Joined
Visits
344
Last Active
Roles
Registered Users
Points
33
Badges
4
Posts
42

Comments

  • @PanzerFutz So i am voting on things and i do not know what i am voting for.... At least they got the feels of real elections spot on.
  • Where i can see selected comanders to vote on?
  • If i would like panzergrenadeirs i would buy them, i do not need doc ability to do so. Specialy that it cost 30 fuel. Imagine abiltity with a tiger that cost 920 manpower + fuel but you get PGrens with them. If you buy something you want to get it …
  • First of all why the nades were added to RA. It is not like british have AT problem, they have plenty of ATs that can bring down even the heaviest german tanks. Problem was that british did not have much things to criple tanks in stock unit choice…
  • Soviet infantry can ride tanks. I do not care how, why. All i care it looks too good not to be in the game.
  • @Yappir said: If you are losing as OKW and you have no fuel on tanks of your own. This tinny rocket luncher is only thing you have to defend yourself with and you guys want to take it away. Don't give me examples of tanks becouse i kn…
  • Yeah, why would you want to buff Jacksons. They are already very fearson oponents in tank battles.
  • but if we remove the camo then how do you imagine attacking a tank with raketenwerfer if it outranges you. As soon as it sees you it will start runing away and your short range will not allow to attack it from the distance like pak 40.
  • Are you guys crazy? OKW literally has no AT. Raketenwerfer has damage of single panzershrek rocket. Panzergrenadiers team has twice as much AT firepower as raketenwerfer. It shorter range then pak 40 makes it very hard to use agaist things like cen…
  • Yay i am mantioned. Also i used onrush becouse we have so many doctrines with name assult in it. So... lets make it a bit difrent.,
  • @PanzerFutz Oh crap i missed the fact that i can do one proposal perf faction! Now i have to remove 3 of my sugestions becouse i sugested 2 per faction! thanks for pointing that out!
  • @PanzerFutz Non of your sugestion do not meet requierments set by the developers. You gotta talk a bit about your idea not just dump it.
  • Dear fellow players. I can see that we are all excited and i everyone is typing his idea what could be a next new fresh doctrine that reinvent thier favorite faction gameplay. We have only few days left before closing oportunity to sugest new doctr…
  • Doctrine inspirated by the one from @Hower12 Western Armour Doctrine 0CP Stugs Stugs G and E can now be build in light mechanisated company (repair station truck). First of all thier price has to be adjusted to OKW. Puma has difrent costs …
  • Siege Doctrine 0 CP - Assault Grenadiers Hardly ever used unit mostly becouse it is only included in one doctrine that is not really offering anything besides more unit choices. 2 CP - Arty Officer Very good unit, not seeing enough plays. I …
  • I just read that there is a limit of one sugestion per faction. While unaware i made another sugestion. I would like to withdraw this sugestion. I am keeping it for the track record. (Spoiler)
  • @karapapagan Why would I want to have BOTH FJs and panzerfusilers? This is a waste of slot for an ability. they are both additional infantry type. Point of new unit is to give you new strategical option to invest in. Here i have 2 options that giv…
  • I just read that there is a limit of one sugestion per faction. While unaware i made another sugestion. I would like to withdraw this sugestion. I am keeping it for the track record. (Spoiler)
  • @karapapagan Great doctrine! If it would be picked up by game developers i would definitly buy it. Again, similar to mine, what is the bigegst reason to be honest. I am interested in concript doctrines as I love to play them and I feel like they a…
  • @LurKatWurK You want FJs to cost 0 CP? This unit is completley broken and you want it easier to spam from the very start? Madness...
  • @WilhelmIX Well comander of my sugestion gotta include ppshes, This is MOST useful perk in soviet doctrines. Othwerwise concript are worthless in the late game. other improvments would be nice for varation but the rules states that we have to use …
  • We already have plenty of defencive doctrines, why to add another? How would you push enemy back with static defences?
  • @WilhelmIX I love the idea for Zis Truck. Maybe it could be a field hospital. Soviets are only faction with out any option to heal in the middle of the map what tends to be annoying. I also like idea of alterative package for concripts. have yo…
  • I just read that there is a limit of one sugestion per faction. While unaware i made another sugestion. I would like to withdraw this sugestion. I am keeping it for the track record. (Spoiler)
  • Hey. I tough of soviet comander focused on use and support of concripts. I feel like soviets could have something around spaming concripts, specialy that there are not that many doctrines fully focused on that and soviet infantry is pathetic compere…
  • Oh i understood you can sugest a comander too. Lets talk about the elephant in the room then. Guard rifle combined are literaly same to Soviet shock except two first abilities. How about replacing the 152 mm hotwizer with something else. A…
  • Hello fellows and hopefuly dear developers. I was thinking what could be made out of existing soviet abilities and suprisingly i came up with quite a lot of ideas so here they are. Heavy Guard Dvision Doctrine focused on using heavy tanks and br…
  • Hello i wanted to sugest the new face of Osttruppen doctrine. The guidlines says not to sugest a content that is not preexisting but I do not want to resign out of my idea that I posted some time ago. I hope that, You, dear developers will nto be di…
  • Hello. Some time ago i posted a sugestion on the idea to remake Osttruppen Doctrine. The sugestion however requires changes in the game like new units for example. The guidline sugest to use preexisting units but i decided not ot chnage my sugestio…
Avatar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Badges

5 LikesName Dropper10 CommentsFirst Comment
  • © SEGA. SEGA, the SEGA logo, Relic Entertainment, the Relic Entertainment logo, Company of Heroes and the Company of Heroes logo are either trademarks or registered trademarks of SEGA Holdings Co., Ltd. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. SEGA is registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.