Bogeyfox
About
- Banned
- Username
- Bogeyfox
- Joined
- Visits
- 226
- Last Active
- Roles
- Registered Users
- Points
- 64
- Badges
- 10
- Posts
- 148
Reactions
-
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
That's what I wrote: Do you need to rephrase it in your own words to feel better? I don't get your new information??? BTW: If inf units blob it doesn't matter if it's 5 or 4 they get wiped... And for… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
1st let's get to facts. USF has a vet snare on RMs and no snare on REs. Which is quite not the same what you say. 2nd Brits have a 5 men upgrade which is not present from the beginning and the snare … (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
YOUR QUOTE: All Allied AT infantry have access to engine damage abilities, and all Allied AT infantry are 5 or 6 man squads [...] YOu didn't say some are very poor units, i.e. sappers or have low ran… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
Su76 = SU85? Or T76? Do you understand the concept of penetration? Or odds? If a tank has 160 armour a pen of 300+ doesn't increase the chances to deal full damage. It won't even deal more damage....… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
It's a great argument to say you play bad. It's so cool and shows how your balance mind works. This game had balance problems since the beta. And now it's getting even worse again. Why. Because it's … (View Post)
Badges
