Bogeyfox
About
- Banned
- Username
- Bogeyfox
- Joined
- Visits
- 226
- Last Active
- Roles
- Registered Users
- Points
- 64
- Badges
- 10
- Posts
- 148
Reactions
-
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
(Quote) That's what I wrote: (Quote) Do you need to rephrase it in your own words to feel better? I don't get your new information??? BTW: If inf units blob it doesn't matter if it's 5 or 4 they get … (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
(Quote) 1st let's get to facts. USF has a vet snare on RMs and no snare on REs. Which is quite not the same what you say. 2nd Brits have a 5 men upgrade which is not present from the beginning and th… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
(Quote) YOUR QUOTE: All Allied AT infantry have access to engine damage abilities, and all Allied AT infantry are 5 or 6 man squads [...] YOu didn't say some are very poor units, i.e. sappers or have… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
(Quote) Su76 = SU85? Or T76? Do you understand the concept of penetration? Or odds? If a tank has 160 armour a pen of 300+ doesn't increase the chances to deal full damage. It won't even deal more da… (View Post) -
Re: [ALL][ALL] Armour penetration bias
(Quote) It's a great argument to say you play bad. It's so cool and shows how your balance mind works. This game had balance problems since the beta. And now it's getting even worse again. Why. Becau… (View Post)
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Badges
