Logo Platform
Company of Heroes 3
Universe banner wording

Wehr needs a redesign / rework badly

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
10 days ago
Nov 10, 2024, 9:32:20 PM

Talking about Teamgames(3vs3 & 4vs4):


Wher is sooo much weaker than the allies. Especially their early game! No matter what you do, you have to be lucky to win the first engagement (2-3 mins).

And still if so, Allies feels so much more forgiving..


In the super early:
Vs Brits..  which have their op pios + either MG, 1 Inf-section or a Dingo

Vs Usf.. which have always MORE units in general...


There is no chance that Wehr has an equal fair fight in the early facing a 1v1 on a lane (Teamgames).

Grens & Pios are super weak, and an MG can be flanked easily by the Allies (since they have more AND stronger units in the early anyways).

And the early light vehicles Allies have (4x4-Truck, Dingo or Weasel) doesn't make it easier, since you need vet1 !!! to be able to faust them... Ofc, you can upgrade them, but with that amount of fuel give-away early you lose against the next wave of mid-light tanks (Humber and M16 quad anti air truck)... bc your tech gets delayed then.


And why the hell does Wehr have both AA options in one single building !?!? Wirbelwind and Flak 30 Anti-aircraft Gun Team?
You need the other building so bad, coz without Panzergrenadiers you don't have any good mainlane infantry, and the Pak40 for decent AT support. On larger maps the 250Medtruck is also essential important.

Going for both buildings? Well, you're probably not having any fuel left, to build some own tanks soon then...

My Elo is usually around gold II and silver III. And often I see way lower ranked players, just bloob-rightclicking their entire army across the map. Which in my eyes doesn't require any skill at all!!!

Only Wehr is super static and needs their entire arsenal to be effective... and that ofc requires way more attention and multitasking!!


It feels like 8 out of 10 games I play against usf-Airbore, which seems to be the most brain-afk doctrine in the game.


I played coh2 for like 6k hours and coh3 already for 1,2k... and I can say that Wehrmacht in coh3 sucks badly compared to the other factions.


It isn't it obvious that Wehr has the lowest winrate in Teamgames since release !? (elo 1100-1399 Iron - Gold) Which I'd say represents the majority of the player base.



Maybe they're designed more for 1v1 game mode? Or its just that the Allies are more beginners friendly or easier to play in general?

Bc I don't think this can be fixed if you buff something here or nerf something there.

For me the entire Wehrmacht techtree is a faildesign and will mostly likely always lead to an unbalanced experiance.






Updated 10 days ago.
0
10 days ago
Nov 10, 2024, 10:04:29 PM

Completely agree, the points you made are exactly the challenges.  You need great skill to hold out through all that to survive to a stage of the game where you might be able to compete but even then allies will arty or tank spam you death.  


Most of the games I play now vs USF, they don't even build tanks, it's just endless rifles or rangers and arty and at guns.  Playing DAK a lot recently and there's just no counter unless you can survive until Tiger.  But for that you have to have map control for fuel and for all the reasons you said above that still apply you struggle to have map control...

Updated 10 days ago.
0
10 days ago
Nov 11, 2024, 6:55:30 AM

Just to add another proof.

I just had a 4vs4 (all Wehr vs mixed) and we lost like super badly right away (enemies had the same average skill level)
Then I realized, lets check the stats for team compositions... and no wonder, 4 times Wehr has by far the lowest winrate in 4vs4!!! (same elo range between 1100-1399, Iron - Gold)




I dont think this can be fixed with small adjustments, nor new doctrines!


Updated 10 days ago.
0
10 days ago
Nov 11, 2024, 8:56:26 AM

I absolutely agree; the difficulties are precisely what you mentioned.  To survive through all of that and reach a point in the game where you might be able to compete, you need to have a lot of skill, but even then, allies will tank spam or arty you to death.  

0
9 days ago
Nov 11, 2024, 11:01:51 PM

I agree and I also think DAK needs it too, so that is what I'll go over. Tdhe issue is not necessarily the performance of the units in and of itself but the fact that they are crazy expensive. For example. On maps with buildings on important points you absolutely need some form of indirect fire or you won't be able to dislodge units. Allies get mortars almost immediately from their 15 fuel buildings for the huge huge cost of 260mp. Meanwhile DAK has to:
1. Get a 250 halftrack for... 250 mp
2. Build T1 for 35 fuel
3. Get the halftrack upgrade for 150mp
4. Finally buy the mortar upgrade for 75 munitions.
And this would be ok I guess if the DAK mortar was significantly better but it just isn't It's definitely worse than the US laser beam mortar which for some unknown reason has multiple times better scatter modifiers than other mortars (over two times better) while having the same damage and AOE and for the love of me I cannot understand why. It has the same stats as the wehr and ukf mortar but costs 400mp and 75 muni ffs. All this time the laser accurate US mortars evaporate your infantry and team weapons and if you don't use your orb of clairvoyance and predict that the enemy player used a barrage on your 250 it will kill the 250 in two direct shots.

This was an example but this theme is all accross the board the same. Allies get cheaper units that are usually better or on a similar level that don't require the slightest bit of thought to play and as axis factions you need to do a milion bullshit things like making sure you have vics with your inf so they get the bonus, not loosing anything because your upgrades are super expensive and you need to maintain your vet to get the other bonuses like the med truck bonus and other things to even think of having the slightest chance vs a braindead blob that has one click access to everything they need and doesn't need to pull any tricks to get their full stats. Now this would be ok if playing the full combined arms setup gave you an actual advantage but it doesn't it just barely allows you to keep pace.

The obvious example of this is the DAK pgren situation. In order to give them the slightest chance of winning with rifleman you need them to:
1. Have a vic nearby (cheapest option is krad for 180mp)
2. Need to have the 6 man upgrade (250mp)
3. To have a fairly certain victory you also need the machinegun for 100 munitions.
So... what is the problem here? you just spent 730mp and 100muni to get a single pgren squad that is able to win against a rifle squad. You have gained no additional utility or anything. The krad is super easy to kill and probably will die if you don't keep it out of the fight after the early game so basically you have an additional capping unit and one pgren squad for the cost of 3 rifle squads. It doesn't take a genius to figure out which is better. And... Rifles can also get upgrades at which point it is more or less a fair fight but they have two more squads than you and you have a funny motorcycle that can't fcking back up despite the real thing having a damn reverse gear. Luckily for axis, we need to remove the things they actually had, but lets give allies black princes that never saw the war. And this is core stuff we are talking about, not some weird niche side tech unit but core absolutely needed units. The bad stuff for allies is all bs that is just there as an interesting add on and not core build.

Another thing is the med trucks, why the hell is the DAK truck a one shot kill? The brit one has almost twice the Hp, just why?

0
9 days ago
Nov 11, 2024, 11:56:12 PM

You forgot to mention vet 1 on the US mortar... once airburst comes out the first shot will 75% destroy any infantry under neath it and if it's a weapons team in the time needed to pack it up the second shot will land and auto wipe it completely... then roll in the 7 bar rifle squads... gg that game and every game



SEPH_27 wrote:

I agree and I also think DAK needs it too, so that is what I'll go over. Tdhe issue is not necessarily the performance of the units in and of itself but the fact that they are crazy expensive. For example. On maps with buildings on important points you absolutely need some form of indirect fire or you won't be able to dislodge units. Allies get mortars almost immediately from their 15 fuel buildings for the huge huge cost of 260mp. Meanwhile DAK has to:
1. Get a 250 halftrack for... 250 mp
2. Build T1 for 35 fuel
3. Get the halftrack upgrade for 150mp
4. Finally buy the mortar upgrade for 75 munitions.
And this would be ok I guess if the DAK mortar was significantly better but it just isn't It's definitely worse than the US laser beam mortar which for some unknown reason has multiple times better scatter modifiers than other mortars (over two times better) while having the same damage and AOE and for the love of me I cannot understand why. It has the same stats as the wehr and ukf mortar but costs 400mp and 75 muni ffs. All this time the laser accurate US mortars evaporate your infantry and team weapons and if you don't use your orb of clairvoyance and predict that the enemy player used a barrage on your 250 it will kill the 250 in two direct shots.

This was an example but this theme is all accross the board the same. Allies get cheaper units that are usually better or on a similar level that don't require the slightest bit of thought to play and as axis factions you need to do a milion bullshit things like making sure you have vics with your inf so they get the bonus, not loosing anything because your upgrades are super expensive and you need to maintain your vet to get the other bonuses like the med truck bonus and other things to even think of having the slightest chance vs a braindead blob that has one click access to everything they need and doesn't need to pull any tricks to get their full stats. Now this would be ok if playing the full combined arms setup gave you an actual advantage but it doesn't it just barely allows you to keep pace.

The obvious example of this is the DAK pgren situation. In order to give them the slightest chance of winning with rifleman you need them to:
1. Have a vic nearby (cheapest option is krad for 180mp)
2. Need to have the 6 man upgrade (250mp)
3. To have a fairly certain victory you also need the machinegun for 100 munitions.
So... what is the problem here? you just spent 730mp and 100muni to get a single pgren squad that is able to win against a rifle squad. You have gained no additional utility or anything. The krad is super easy to kill and probably will die if you don't keep it out of the fight after the early game so basically you have an additional capping unit and one pgren squad for the cost of 3 rifle squads. It doesn't take a genius to figure out which is better. And... Rifles can also get upgrades at which point it is more or less a fair fight but they have two more squads than you and you have a funny motorcycle that can't fcking back up despite the real thing having a damn reverse gear. Luckily for axis, we need to remove the things they actually had, but lets give allies black princes that never saw the war. And this is core stuff we are talking about, not some weird niche side tech unit but core absolutely needed units. The bad stuff for allies is all bs that is just there as an interesting add on and not core build.

Another thing is the med trucks, why the hell is the DAK truck a one shot kill? The brit one has almost twice the Hp, just why?


0
9 days ago
Nov 12, 2024, 9:33:42 AM

But I'm actually not sure Wehr needs a rework, I've long said the edge needs to be taken off the allies... nerf grants a little, remove the silly infantry company bonuses for USF and tone down airburst and someone else had a really good idea to increase received accuracy for blobs so the rifle blobs get penalised etc.  Small changes that make a big difference.


Though I do agree on things like DAK bike etc, for it to be useful as a recon unit it needs to be too near to combat and dies instantly.  Wehr need some more consistent recon, allies have so much stock and battlegroup recon vs ger.  Again makes spotting and artying anything that counters the allied blobs far too easy.

0
9 days ago
Nov 12, 2024, 1:46:09 PM

The Bike is sadly the result of the devs refusing to rework the L6/40 tanks. If Bike is good then the silly 5 Bike into 5min L6/40 strat is viable again. Rework L6/40 and the Bike can probably be buffed. L6/40 being also useless outside of the cheese strats with it is annoying, would be better for everyone if it got reworked. 


Med truck for DAK is weaker because its the only truck that gives inf a combat buff with its vet. It's 10% ROF 10% acc 20% speed for 45 seconds, no small buff really. If they removed it and made the vet healing or MP reductions then it could probably have more HP. 

Updated 9 days ago.
0
8 days ago
Nov 12, 2024, 4:55:32 PM
Fatal_Thoughts wrote:

But I'm actually not sure Wehr needs a rework, I've long said the edge needs to be taken off the allies... nerf grants a little, remove the silly infantry company bonuses for USF and tone down airburst and someone else had a really good idea to increase received accuracy for blobs so the rifle blobs get penalised etc.  Small changes that make a big difference.


Though I do agree on things like DAK bike etc, for it to be useful as a recon unit it needs to be too near to combat and dies instantly.  Wehr need some more consistent recon, allies have so much stock and battlegroup recon vs ger.  Again makes spotting and artying anything that counters the allied blobs far too easy.

Sure, Relic could go that way. But in my eyes this would cause way more work in the end.

Not saying that it is wrong tho, but there is a lot more you haven't mentioned.


All this Manpower cheats, 6 weapons on a ranger squad...  Also that they're the only unit, who can shot certain weapons on the move...


And why on earth is USF the only faction, which can choose between vet upgrades??? I simply don't get it...  This allows them to adapt way more effectively to current conditions.


Or for eg. why does the Brit have a Bishop the most strongest artillery piece as a non-doctrinal choice ?? It is just ridiculous how good that ting is. And it directly hard counters every Teamweapons & Emplacements.


So many questionable decisions!

In my opinion Wehr needs a urgent rework in order to hopefully catch up with all the weird choices the devs are making.

0
8 days ago
Nov 12, 2024, 8:13:14 PM

Supply Surplus

loiter

british t4 refund

ranger

grant

Ammunition Storage


all need nerf


and Ammunition Storage can reduce bishop barrage to 20s cd and till now they still not nerf it , i should say, the game have so few player have a reason

0
8 days ago
Nov 12, 2024, 9:46:31 PM
wusadsaw wrote:

Supply Surplus

loiter

british t4 refund

ranger

grant

Ammunition Storage


all need nerf


and Ammunition Storage can reduce bishop barrage to 20s cd and till now they still not nerf it , i should say, the game have so few player have a reason

Uh, good points!!!

The Brit vehicle refund. Jesus.. why is that even in the game? Why only the Brits have access to that?? It is just another unfair ability for the Allies..

I had games were a Brits went for a Dingo early going next 1 or even 2 additionally Humbers... so my response in order to counter/defend all that early vehicle aggression was 1 - 2 Pak40s. 


But after he saw them, they disappeared from the battlefield. And I thought the entire game, someone else must have killed them. Just to realize watching the replay afterwards, that he has simply refunded them, and went for 2 Bishops instead, to arty the sh*t out of me.


So basically my build order until then, to adapt his early aggression was suddenly nonsense, since he simply sold his units and went for something else instead. But since Wehr cannot do that, I had to stick to my (now) kinda useless units, bleeding to his swapped arty...

It is just stupid! How come they allow one side to sell their vehicles, and others not? They can simply play with it, and fake it. Build vehicles, watch them go for counters and then sell them to go for something else instead.


The self-building Ammunition Storages are also very questionable. The allies already have more units in general, so why give them even more opportunities to not split their blobbs!?

I don't think they nerf / change all those abilities any time soon. I guess it will take a few years until they find out, what everything else needs to be adjusted. Bc there are so many small things, they just don't see it.

Updated 8 days ago.
0
7 days ago
Nov 13, 2024, 10:16:48 PM
wusadsaw wrote:
british t4 refund

Totally forgot about this but come to think of it, USF can choose vet and the support centers, brits have vehicle refund, DAK has the universal utility like capping on all vehicles, repair on inf and so on. What is the special sauce for wehr? Maybe it just isn't coming to mind at the moment but I think they have nothing?

0
7 days ago
Nov 14, 2024, 1:36:25 PM
SEPH_27 wrote:
wusadsaw wrote:
british t4 refund

Totally forgot about this but come to think of it, USF can choose vet and the support centers, brits have vehicle refund, DAK has the universal utility like capping on all vehicles, repair on inf and so on. What is the special sauce for wehr? Maybe it just isn't coming to mind at the moment but I think they have nothing?

-Wehr has by far the least amount of upgrades.
-Their early is by far the weakest (not only weak, I believe it is obviously unfair / unbalanced, USF easily outnumbers you right away and there is nothing you can do about it!)
-They highly depend on the right choice of doctrine (eg. you need Panthers or a Tiger to deal with the heavy Brit armor. Or Wespe / Obice, if they dig in) [Not like Brits, which always can go Bishop just in case...]

-Everything feels so expensive, if you lose something, there is almost zero chance of a recover. Allies feel way more forgiving! I had so many wipes and yet they still could compete with me...


I don't see any unique advantage Wehr has over other factions. Maybe the Vet upgrade on its buildings? Which Is nice in general, but cots so much that you mostly get it (to)late

0
7 days ago
Nov 14, 2024, 1:43:18 PM
SEPH_27 wrote:
wusadsaw wrote:
british t4 refund

Totally forgot about this but come to think of it, USF can choose vet and the support centers, brits have vehicle refund, DAK has the universal utility like capping on all vehicles, repair on inf and so on. What is the special sauce for wehr? Maybe it just isn't coming to mind at the moment but I think they have nothing?

Maybe merge I guess? It is quite powerful if used correctly. I know grens pay for it in performance but im talking the MP reduction ability of it, if micro well with luff it can challenge USF's MP reductions. 


 I wouldn't consider it a faction mechanic on its own though. Feels they need a little something extra. 

0
6 days ago
Nov 14, 2024, 3:32:08 PM
Jonnies wrote:
SEPH_27 wrote:
wusadsaw wrote:
british t4 refund

Totally forgot about this but come to think of it, USF can choose vet and the support centers, brits have vehicle refund, DAK has the universal utility like capping on all vehicles, repair on inf and so on. What is the special sauce for wehr? Maybe it just isn't coming to mind at the moment but I think they have nothing?

Maybe merge I guess? It is quite powerful if used correctly. I know grens pay for it in performance but im talking the MP reduction ability of it, if micro well with luff it can challenge USF's MP reductions. 


 I wouldn't consider it a faction mechanic on its own though. Feels they need a little something extra. 

Good idea, but nah...  I am using it all the time. And it is not a huge thing. It starts to pay off more once you have more expensive units like Pgrens or Jäger. In the very early stage the enemies just swap the target then. Since after using it, it leaves the Grens I just used it with, is low then instead.. (and they always have more units either way..).


It is a general issue, that BOTH Allies have such strong first main-lane-infantry!! With very good upgrade possibilities... (even Dak can!). Only Wehr got super weak Volks with no upgrades (except with doctrine).

So this game-desing gives Wehr right away an huge disatvantage over all other factions. And since this gamedesing benefits from spam&roam, which doesn't really require any much multitasking nor skill in general. Wehr always will more likely lose.. especially in the early stage, since Allies ALSO have access to vehicles right away (Wehr not!). And they cannot do anything against them! (as mentioned above in my earlier post already)

Wehr urgently needs a rework!!! Some additionally units to help with the start/early of the game, not just a buff or something.
Weaken the scout car and give it to the Tier1 building. Or swap the Ketten to a Kübel, a Kfz-13 or something. Or bring back the Osttruppen for T1, to assist in numbers against the new Redarmy-style USF faction.

Something fundamental has to be done. With this techtree Wehrmacht has currently, and the current beneficial spam and roam style (bc they can, except Wehr) Wehrmacht will ALWAYS be the worst faction in the game (which it is since release). Statistics proof!!!

0
6 days ago
Nov 15, 2024, 1:01:36 AM

The only thing Whermacht really needs is a rework of the Stug. It sucks vs Tanks and it Sucks vs Infantry. They need to get rid of the Vet 1 ability and allow for Ammo Swap like the Panzer 4 Command Tank (Switching between Anti Tank and Anti-Infantry Rounds). 

0
6 days ago
Nov 15, 2024, 11:56:01 AM

Nah mate, the statistics clearly proof that Wehr is seriously struggeling in team games!

Whether it is Allies being to strong, having to good unbalanced abilities and better upgrades etc. Or just Wehr simple to complex, failed in its intentionally meaning/niche-design, lack of upgrades..


And by the way the Stug just got buffed. I think it is okay in it state. It can compete with inf if you can afford the mg upgrade, and if they get to close the vet ability is actually useful (most players forget about it). And if you have at least 2 (or more) which I recommend, they also benefit from the t4 armor upgrade. I believe they're also faster in chasing down other tanks!?

I think giving the t4 armor upgrade also to the t3 building would be good! I mean you can also upgrade the support weapons from both buildings tho...

Maybe a range increase would suit them as well. Since they are tank hunters?

Updated 6 days ago.
0
5 days ago
Nov 15, 2024, 8:14:24 PM

Honestly, come to think of it It would be best to rework all other factions rather than wehr xd. My biggest wish is to see a different form of gameplay than the allied blob. Game after game these mindless masses just going forward... I have to kill 3-4 times more than them to pull out a victory it really is abhorent.

0
3 days ago
Nov 18, 2024, 7:05:03 AM

Yeah well, I definitely agree with you in that sense. But the way Allies are designed, will always lead them towards easier (very noob friendly) "tactics".


I mean for instance... they have tanks like Humber / Stuard / Greyhounds etc... they easily dominate midgame phase, just by their roam possibility. If you get defenses on your side, they just swap and roam around and bother Somone else. Meanwhile (as Wehr) you're super slow and static, with your pak40 or Stug / Mader in order to follow them and assist your m8s. And you can't always go for Jägers, bc if you go blind they could get countered easily


Maybe Wehr doesn't need a redesign / rework and instead just the Allies needs to get taken a lot of their BS away...

Who knows how the devs actually wanna balance Wehr out.. changing the numbers won't solve the problem. Bc if they get ahead again, they will receive a hotfix right away again. Meanwhile yet again we need to wait months for the next balance patch to address current issues with Allies! And Wehr remains the weakest faction in Teamgames...

Updated 3 days ago.
0
2 days ago
Nov 18, 2024, 3:05:12 PM
Crowhind wrote:

Yeah well, I definitely agree with you in that sense. But the way Allies are designed, will always lead them towards easier (very noob friendly) "tactics".


I mean for instance... they have tanks like Humber / Stuard / Greyhounds etc... they easily dominate midgame phase, just by their roam possibility. If you get defenses on your side, they just swap and roam around and bother Somone else. Meanwhile (as Wehr) you're super slow and static, with your pak40 or Stug / Mader in order to follow them and assist your m8s. And you can't always go for Jägers, bc if you go blind they could get countered easily


Maybe Wehr doesn't need a redesign / rework and instead just the Allies needs to get taken a lot of their BS away...

Who knows how the devs actually wanna balance Wehr out.. changing the numbers won't solve the problem. Bc if they get ahead again, they will receive a hotfix right away again. Meanwhile yet again we need to wait months for the next balance patch to address current issues with Allies! And Wehr remains the weakest faction in Teamgames...

Curious, if you think wehr are underperforming in team modes due to the stats which I agree with. Do you also think DAK are overperforming? Because DAK has over 50% WR most the time with teams of 3+ DAK. 


The interesting thing about it is the WR is around 50% for DDWW vs any allies composition, this would lead me to think the issue is more with axis and not with allies being OP. Axis WR changes a lot more based on there composition not really that of the allied team.


If you nerfed allies to gets wehrs WR higher then surely DAK's WR would just climb too. 



Updated 2 days ago.
0
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment
0